About your Search

20121101
20121130
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
that includes the classified information. megyn: right. so she knew more than she was el telling us. i see your point. it's not that she just withheld the information about al-qaeda, she made statements that seemed to say al-qaeda had been decimated. of course, in the written statement she provided today to the public, which i want to tell our viewers we have, and in her meetings with you as well came out and did say the talking points provided by the intelligence community were incorrect in a key mr. mr. prest respect. there was no -- in a key respect. she's admitting now that what she said -- in right. megyn: she's blaming it on the intelligence committee. who told her to go on the sunday talk shows, and who specifically gave her this information? >> well, she was asked -- which i think has already been talked about earlier -- she was asked to go on the sunday talk shows by the white house. and the talking points were given to her by the intelligence community. let me just be clear, the information that was given by the intelligence community about the protests of the video, that was wrong, a
are see eling classified info, the very fact that he's been compromised is the threat itself. >> right. none of us have access to what was actually in the e-mails. but, so we don't -- >> doesn't matter. >> what we have to do is trust the fbi judgment at the this point until we have other information that contradicts it that there was no national security implication regarding this affair. now, to take jay's argument, i think, to its logical conclusion, the argument would be that anytime anybody has access to national security information, top secret information, be that person is engaged in an extramarital affair as such they could potentially be blackmailed, then it is the fbi's duty to inform congress and the executive agency. that would mean that anytime a member of congress is involved in an extramarital affair, that all the congressional committees should be notified -- >> no. >> because that's -- megyn: no, i want to jump in because -- hold on, hold on. >> top secret information as well. >> not what i said. megyn: i want to focus right now on the attorney general because we do un
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)